Actually, I did not find your message to be angry or ranting at; in fact, I actually agree with your post 100% and believe that you have explained the situation better than I ever could. I do not know if my message brought forth the correct message, but I what I meant to say was I believed that...whoever the parents are, I don't know their names nor care to know...were trying to keep a very outdated and sad tradition of mass-childbearing/children-are-our-labor-source alive despite the harmful consequences that it could bring. Both in regards to the woman (how is she even still alive?) and (mostly) to the wellbeing of the children (which, as I said, you explained this very well and even brought up some disturbing points that even I didn't think of at the time). Maybe the parents are not meaning to do this out of bad intentions, but still, this is very much "nuts" and cringeworthy when more things besides "family" is considered. And, like you said, family is not everything.
I am very sorry if I caused a misunderstanding.